From across the air-battle of mouth Twitter names the reflection from the Star War of words?
Autumn dryness is causing downs, is microblogging age star also had become irresponsibly, mouth put my foot? Today when two of the most earth-shattering actress take on Twitter, you called me was “blame Lady”, “DJ.Johnny.mix”, “lying stupid”, I called you “plunder feelings” and “vent their anger on people”, is dragged in by them, the two men also unfortunate were to turn around on the Internet, the tragic human search.
Stunned onlookers and Crystal Huang Huo Siyan when naming names, cross border two big brothers Guo degang and Jiang Kun empty isolation of mouth battle has come into the second round.
Star War of words engaged in a, you sing I debut, artistic views different to swear, vying for position to scold, new work by FRY to swear, dispute to swear, fail to scold, bear also called sth
I curse therefore I am, seems to have become the present rule of showbiz.
Stars: war of words and then refined, as well as the cultural tradition topples over
On September 28, Jiang Kun when it comes to cross development present situation in Guangzhou, he has issued a challenge: “Guo degang makes so many things on the Internet, there are so many problems on the moral and ethical, I do not understand why there are so many others like him? “The last few days, many of the media in reporting on this statement in the cause of the incident.
Then, Guo degang micro-bori with a an eight-line poem with seven characters to a line and a strict tonal patterned rhyme scheme in Take That, dark satire Jiang Kun “dry up”, even in the evening of October 3 talk by Guo degang these years, we have been teahouse in concert through said monolog of the JI Gong, again hit back at criticism of Jiang Kun: “this is what eunuch say? ”
As an extension of this war of words, on October 16, Jiang Kun again: “now some media one-sided pursuit of economic efficiency, the expense of social benefits, sought after by some three to have indiscriminate effects of the bad art. “Next, Guo degang fire Twitter stand up fight back:” you believe it or not, the video over here. Your clothes and they object to show is a success. You curse or swear, history has been so written. “” Cross sector the rules of the bullied old not bullying the small, do not you know? ”
Two of a trade never agree, eating cross this bowl of rice, because of the different artistic views and spoon with pots along the normal. This time, Guo degang and Jiang Kun empty isolation of the war of words, to be blunt was a “comic dialogues are ya or vulgar” discussion. However, the discussion on the artistic problems from from an artistic point of, and should not be done by personal attacks. Problems rise to the height of moral art at every turn, so indiscriminate or the words together, in any case is not a discussion on art the proper attitude.
Since the microblogging platform, fans were able to not only close to Idol interactive, the public influence of the stars will be further enhanced. However, as a public figure, through Twitter this open channels to vent dissatisfaction, private event on the public, and even allow their fans to join the war of words, thus turning it into a public event, in any case, is a career failure. Even if the war of words were then packed refinement for public figures, and is also the cultural tradition topples over things. Friends have said: “this war of words not necessarily curse others, actually first called himself, exposed at least a little of his own. ”
Media: speculation of ulterior motives when East must stop
Moment has entered second PK “Jiang Guo war”, initially causes war seems confusing. According to media reports in Guangzhou, Jiang Kun, recently in Guangzhou was invited to “2011 Guangzhou Municipal higher talent theory of literature and art workshop” lectures, lectures on Guo degang did not mention in any of the comments. In that case, the phrase with double quotation marks Jiang Kun shelling of Guo degang “moral philosophy” come from?
In this battle of words, some media excited to play the role of indifference. A portal site even has undertaken a “support Guo degang was Jiang Kun” voting activity, claim nearly 870,000 Netizen participation, Guo degang’s support rate is nearly 96%, more outspoken in the media on the manuscript title “war of words after Jiang Kun inside and not the person”, has made no secret of Guo degang back. Surprising is that some say experts and scholars have come forward to use Twitter and TV interviews, sarcastic, and shout curses, related developments from the art of going away from us.
Jiang Kun’s delicate relations with Guo degang, has always been some media about topics. Like the “Jiang Kun claimed against little theatre, talk by Guo degang Jiang Kun oppose” such news, later proved to be speculation with ulterior motives.
More than Jiang Kun and conflicts of Guo degang was fried-fried, even and Crystal Huang Huo Siyan such contest, network press is devoted to say hello, had caught a “cultural events” surprises.
Star of the “scandal” why always turn into “super news”? Some say this is Star survival: new comers, to its debut; gas star, comeback; work not to, play, and gossip make enough; valid red, also to be icing on the cake. Facing the increasingly fierce market competition, increasing media survive stress, do not rely on “seas”, there is no such “public event”, page views, ratings how complete, who is there to buy a newspaper?
So the stars cool a little, down a little from time to time out, put some media to “entertainment till I die” situation. Page views, ratings, and a circulation running all the way when, early media on social responsibility is left behind, and they usually ladies first excuse is “public”.
Public: onlookers needs high quality “entertainment spirit”
Compared with implicit metaphor a little irony, war of words seems to be more strongly worded stars attract public attention.
In July this year, Tongji University Humanities Professor, doctoral supervisor, Zhang sheng in the press issued by Zhou LIBO “allows viewers see is superficial and poor upbringing”, Zhou LIBO immediately “foul language” Twitter response: “your language is a Physiology teacher”, “impressions of Tongji University in no Tibetan Mastiff”.
Because of dissatisfaction with an actress comments own perspective on the huabiao Awards Pack, actor went to “allege”, microblogging insinuate an actress “pretend to be a Saint”, and list the actors “seven sins”.
The end of last month, Hunan TV host Zhang Dandan suddenly posted in their own microblogging CCTV3 pictures of the happy hero of three women chairpersons saying: “not seen such a disgusting host! “And insisted that the criticism is a personal opinion, and” peer inhumanity “nothing” time doesn’t lack sound, missing is “.
In fact, these stars “language not astonishing” nature with very strong performances. They know very well, standing on the stage, high profile opening there will be a high spot on the body, giving themselves instantly became the center of the stage and the focus of public opinion.
Disputes and animosity between the stars, is inherently a private topic, triggered the war of words it’s not “publicity” to speak of, really need to “public interest”? Even star exposes closet, no need for too many onlookers, bystanders rushing headlong into mass action is not required gang war.
”Live entertainment” era of stars more than anecdotes as tea after dinner to talk about would be all, but how to train and bring up to avoid poor taste, the pursuit of good prevailing practice of “entertainment spirit” is still an important subject of social and cultural development. Reporter Wu Xiaodong